Page 20 - CINEMARECORD-100
P. 20

th
                       CONGRATULATIONS ON CR’S 100  ISSUE


                                                     Les Tod, OAM




            ne hundred issues of any magazine is, today, something to be rather proud of.
        OAnd over those 25 years, the gradual transformation of CinemaRecord into
        what it is today is a testament to those who have worked hard over the years to
        maintain it, and to those who have donated material to support it.
        I was Editor of Kino, CR’s compatriot publication and predecessor, for fourteen
        years.  In those years, and in the years that followed under another Editor, Kino
        developed from a home-made magazine into a professional and well researched
        journal.  CinemaRecord has followed in those footsteps and is now a journal that
        any Society would be proud of.  Unlike Kino, which died as a result of the lack of
        written contributions by members, CinemaRecord seems to have no difficulty in this
        area and maintains a high standard of articles from across Australia, and some from
        overseas.

        I joined CATHS about two years after it began, and have most of those early issues.
        Some were researched, some were not, but all provided a springboard for those like
        myself wanting more information on a certain theatre or cinema.  And gradually
        photographs began to appear from libraries, other societies, and private collections.
        And it came at a time when the movie theatre was transitioning from single screens
        into twins and triples, and more recently into the multiplex.  So there was – and still
        is – a whole new area of cinema building and architecture that needs to be recorded
        for the future.
        In Sydney there is a young university graduate whose hobby is recording and photographing multiplexes.  Some of us may deride them as assembly
        line cinemas, run by accountants [and yes, they are] but he is, in his own way, recording the present for the future.  And this is also what CinemaRecord
        is doing, and must continue to do, rather than focus too much on the cinema’s past, as glorious as it once was.

        We members of CATHS were lucky to have seen those golden years of the movie palaces, the furnishings, the giant curtains and wide screens, the
        marble and the glamour.  Although a few theatres today try to retain this atmosphere, it is a time which has passed.  (It may come again, for in Dubai
        a complex of super luxury cinemas, named the Roxy, has recently opened).

        Today’s younger generations have little experience of those older cinemas.  That is why, for the future, CinemaRecord must maintain its high standards
        and continue to record the development and history of Australian theatres, cinemas, and yes, drive-ins, multiplexes and public halls.  It is all tied into
        one.
        In the not too distant future, issues of CinemaRecord, Dress Circle, Kino, and other journals which recorded our theatre history may be digitised by
        public libraries or even Trove, and what we write today will become even more important tomorrow, and open up to a whole new, wider audience.
        Already there are several groups on Facebook which concentrate on theatre history, one of which is run by member Kevin Adams who goes out of
        his way to promote CATHS and CinemaRecord on his site.   But while this is fine for those who only want a photograph and some basic details,
        usually limited to one paragraph, it is up to CinemaRecord to research and detail the proper history of that theatre or cinema, with appropriate
        photographs and where possible, advertisements and also acknowledgements.  We need to maintain that professionalism in order to be taken seriously
        by fellow researchers, writers and academics, and those who will judge us in the future not only for the depth of our research, but also how we express
        it.  Yet we need to balance that, for we are writing for our fellow enthusiasts, and that style of writing is usually personal, ie. one to another. I think
        that CR is achieving that balance and doing it well.

        I also contribute to an e-zine for film making enthusiasts, so we must be aware of technological change and how it can help or hinder us.  E-zines
        are like Kindle, digital and well laid out, but the reader is probably like me,  happier with the tactile feel of a magazine or book in my lap rather than
        a digitised screen.  But there are others who do not see it that way, and embrace that new technology.
                                                                                th
        I congratulate the editors, past and present, who have contributed to bring CinemaRecord to its 100  issue, through their hard work, dedication and
        professionalism, and to those contributors who have helped the journal to achieve that important milestone. ★





















        20    CINEMARECORD  # 100
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25